Now, I'll admit that as a party, Republicans are a mite too quick to fight. In fact, if you look back, McCain's kinda been attacking Obama first (or at least his ads have been on my TV first). However, when you look at it, would you rather have a pacifist, or a Repugilist? I mean, the Republicans may fight too much, but do the Democrats fight enough? Do they actually push for what they want (outside of the bedroom?), or do they just stamp "yea", "nay", or "present", and go back to sleep. Republicans are willing to give blood to defend this country, the Democrats seem unwilling to give a small amount of ink to defend America. So, I ask you, is it better to have a pushover who won't defend the innocent (in fact, if you look at Obama, he blatantly attacks the innocent, or at least doesn't allow his beliefs to intrude on others by defending them, as evidenced in his voting on abortion laws [post-birth abortion, practically], but that's another story [for now, I ask you to picture the political cartoon depicting him standing over a dumpster with a bloody baseball bat saying "Just making sure there are no survivors."]), or is it better to have somebody who would shed his own blood to save every American citizen from radical terrorists?