Why John McCain is best suited for Presidency

Politics. How boring.

Published on April 21, 2008 By erathoniel In Republican

John McCain would make the best president for three reasons. He will get respect from foreign nations, he has all the necessary experience, and he will lead the nation through the turbulent times we face.

First, John McCain would make the best president because he will get respect from foreign nations. Our opponents are known to have racist and sexist members, and therefore having a female or African American president, while an important civil rights goal, is not best suited for our nation right now. Second, John McCain would make the best choices for America because he has the necessary experience. An ex-POW and an experienced politician, John McCain knows war and peace greater than any of the other candidates. Third, John McCain is the best presidential candidate because he will lead the nation through the dangerous times ahead safely. He knows what to do in an emergency due to his experience, and he is acceptable by all foreign nations.

John McCain is America's best Presidential Candidate because he can lead the nation through the dangers ahead, he is experienced, and will recieve respect from our opponents and allies alike.

Comments (Page 3)

erathoniel

on May 01, 2008

He allows straight couples to get married but not gays. Yea that's an absence of privileges to a group of United States citizens due to bigotry and a self imposed moral rule not shared by all.

Actually, I do believe that Dubya made a religious, not political decision here. Marriage is a religious, not civil right.

The_Politico

on May 01, 2008

I can understand why someone who is never right, and stubbornly refuses to admit their errors

What does Bush have to do with this?

You were the one who argued that you being too stupid to comprehend my answers means that my answers don't count.

And that's not even counting the thread where you shit your pants because I wasn't responding to your idiotically slanted anti Obama post.

Dr Guy

on May 02, 2008

What does Bush have to do with this?

Reading is fundamental. Why cant you stick to the subject and not libel with every post? No one was talking Bush. He is not even running (although in your psychotic haze, I am sure you think so). Clearly you have multiple problems, not the least of which is the lack of any human friends, or a brain.

Turnip.

Leauki

on May 02, 2008

Reading is fundamental.

No, no, no. You are not getting this. He thinks he is clever because he wants to associate any talk about a dumb person with George Bush (a man who can fly an airplane). He thinks you are a moron because you didn't notice that you gave him an opportunity to play that little word game.

He is probably 13.

Dr Guy

on May 02, 2008

He is probably 13.

Thatis insulting to 13 year olds.

erathoniel

on May 02, 2008

Airplanes are rumored to be easy to fly. The landing part can hurt, though.

The_Politico

on May 08, 2008

Marriage is a religious institution that the government has no business involved in.

But they are involved in it. Arguing that its okay to ban marriage but then cry that its not discrimination because they shouldn't be involved in marriage is a load of crap.

erathoniel

on May 08, 2008

Well, at least I'm getting some hits on this article any more, despite it being off-topic and more applicable ones being up on JU already (and pending, given your viewpoint).

Second, the civil right of marriage is different than the religious rite. When there is a homosexual marriage, it's not a true "marriage" by textbook definition.

Jmac8

on Jun 01, 2008

The best candidate for republicans was mike huckabee followed by romney.

Rebuke to the author

1. No reason to believe onl McCain will get respected more than any other candidate. Its clear the world doesn't like Bush and will gladly respect anyone but him. Lets be honest here, we didn't get into this race and gender mess by having black and women lawmakers. We had 43 white presidents, and any problems with race or gender in our society are all their fault.

2. McCain is not a good conservative and I question his miltary INTELLIGENCE not experience. Yes he is experienced but he has not learned much in his years. A truly good soldier would not have got caught in war like Bush41 even when his plane was shot down. That is a good conservative. What exactly are McCains great experiences that Clinton and Obama lack? 25 years of flip-flopping in the senate. I'm scarred as hell to vote for McCain because no one really knows what this guys stands for. He votes against civil rights so I have a hard time believing that he would do anything to fix race relations.

3. The fact he was caught in war, voted for the war in Iraq, which we all know we shouldn't have, flip flopped on the war, flip flops on tax cuts, flip flops on illegal immigration and every issue important to conservatives we are better off just giving the democrats this election and take a whipping like Ronald Reagan in 1984 but in reverse and in 2012 we come back with huckabee or a real conservative.

erathoniel

on Jun 01, 2008

We had 43 white presidents, and any problems with race or gender in our society are all their fault.

Bullcrap. None (ok, so almost none) of them wanted any sexism or racism.

SanChonino

on Jun 02, 2008

Bullcrap. None (ok, so almost none) of them wanted any sexism or racism.

Think again. Anyone who calls the Native Americans 'savages' is racist.

Who did that?

Washington. T. Roosevelt.

Or how about that whole 'Manifest Destiny' thing? That's what we call racism in pretty little packages.

My, my, your ignorance is showing again, erathoniel. Better pull up your diapers.

Dr Guy

on Jun 02, 2008

Think again. Anyone who calls the Native Americans 'savages' is racist.

No. They may be culturalists. They may be snobs. But making that statement by itself is not racist. It is also the height of arrogance of the speaker to contend that. It shows they suffer from the exact same crimes the founders were guilty of, and one of them may have been racism. But the belief that ones culture is superior to other cultures is not racism.

erathoniel

on Jun 02, 2008

Think again. Anyone who calls the Native Americans 'savages' is racist.

I'm somewhat N.A., so don't pull that crap on me. That's why I said almost none of them. Also, like Dr Guy said, it's not necessarily racist. It's merely a snobbish remark.

Washington. T. Roosevelt.

Two out of forty-three.

Or how about that whole 'Manifest Destiny' thing? That's what we call racism in pretty little packages.

It's more of an unregulated land-grab with no thoughtfulness for others. It's not really racism so much as a morale booster, as far as I got from it.

The_Politico

on Jun 05, 2008

No one was talking Bush.

You referenced someone who was never right and refuses to admit their errors. That is practically Bush's middle name.

Dr Guy

on Jun 06, 2008

You referenced someone who was never right and refuses to admit their errors. That is practically Bush's middle name.

No, but it appears to be your only talking point. Like a broken record, you dont seem to know how to write anything intelligent or original.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!